<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>SiliconANGLE - Latest Comments in Friendfeed-Facebook Acquisition: The Positive Side</title><link>http://silicon-angle.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://silicon-angle.disqus.com/friendfeed_facebook_acquisition_the_positive_side/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:52:17 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Friendfeed-Facebook Acquisition: The Positive Side</title><link>http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/10/friendfeed-facebook-acquisition-the-positive-side/#comment-14610233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice to read a positive article. I prefer Friendfeed over Facebook, but I think this may even bring better opportunities for Friendfeed to develop and test features.  And if some of the features I have come to love in Friendfeed make it into Facebook... all the better experience for all (as Robert Scoble pointed out, another 300 million eople)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alistair Bull</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:52:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed-Facebook Acquisition: The Positive Side</title><link>http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/10/friendfeed-facebook-acquisition-the-positive-side/#comment-14601189</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jury may be out on mainstream services, but a couple of small realtime web&lt;br&gt;apps I have (they function off of Twitter clicks) make about a $15 CPM off&lt;br&gt;*engagement* based ads.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:29:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed-Facebook Acquisition: The Positive Side</title><link>http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/10/friendfeed-facebook-acquisition-the-positive-side/#comment-14600999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Jury is still out on whether anyone can attract proper ad money to realtime user-generated environments of any sort. At the end of the day it's still just our daily graffiti and only just attracts cheap disposable ads which noone has realised yet only really deliver returns if they are tied to search! 80/20 rule...and all this stuff is within the 80%... imho&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:25:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed-Facebook Acquisition: The Positive Side</title><link>http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/10/friendfeed-facebook-acquisition-the-positive-side/#comment-14600456</link><description>&lt;p&gt;come now!  we don't need no steenking business models!&lt;br&gt;Seriously though, Friendfeed is lightweight enough to be properly monetized&lt;br&gt;into the black much better than Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it makes more sense as an investment for Facebook to think of it as&lt;br&gt;R&amp;amp;D costs, not a monetizable property.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:13:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Friendfeed-Facebook Acquisition: The Positive Side</title><link>http://siliconangle.com/ver2/2009/08/10/friendfeed-facebook-acquisition-the-positive-side/#comment-14600154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thrilled for Paul, but amused that FB's first big land grab is another biz that isn't properly monetized either! Arrogance, Ignorance or Clairvoyance?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:05:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>